Pricing Change
New pricing for orders of material from this site will come into place shortly. Charges for supply of digital images, digitisation on demand, prints and licensing will be altered.
Upcoming Maintenance
Please be advised that this website will undergo scheduled maintenance on the following dates:
Thursday, 9 January: 11:00 AM - 3:00 PM
Thursday, 23 January: 11:00 AM - 3:00 PM
Thursday, 30 January: 11:00 AM - 3:00 PM
During these times, some functionality such as image purchasing may be temporarily unavailable. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause.
Publication Account
Date 1985
Event ID 1016626
Category Descriptive Accounts
Type Publication Account
Permalink http://canmore.org.uk/event/1016626
This inconspicuous ridge was a particularly favoured spot for settlement during the later first millennium BC/early first millennium AD (possibly on account of its sunny aspect and sheltered position), and along its crest there are the remains of no less than three separate settlement sites which show an interesting range of defences and house-types.
The most prominent [NS92SW 18] occupies high ground at the west end of the ridge. This is the largest and most heavily defended of the settlements, but even so, it cannot be classified as a fort, since the single rampal1 offers only a modest defence, and was built by scraping material from the interior, not by digging an external defensive ditch as would have been the case when building a fort. On the north-west traces of three clearly defined quarry scoops can be seen cut into the slope behind the rampart. Three of the four gateways lead straight into the interior, but on the south-west anyone entering the settlement would have been turned to the left before climbing up towards the crest of the ridge. In the interior there are the remains of at least eight buildings, all round timber houses but built using two different techniques. The five on the south-west were placed on platforms excavated into the slope and closely resemble the houses seen in unenclosed platform settlements; the second group, which lie in the north-west, are examples of the ring-ditch style, in which the principal posts were set in a continuous bedding-trench, and this trench can still be seen as a slight depression.
The homestead [NS92SW 33] lies to the west of the settlement and is tucked into the foot of the ridge. It comprises an oval enclosure surrounded by the remains of a ruined stone wall with an entrance on the south-south-west; on the west side of the interior there is a single house platform. To the south-east there are the remains of a small enclosure [NS92SW 23] which may be associated either with the homestead or the settlement. About 75m east of the settlement there is an embanked enclosure [NS92SW 21] (not illustrated), measuring about 18m in internal diameter, which may have surrounded a timber house.
The ridge thus contains traces of at least three phases of settlement; without excavation it is not possible to be certain of the chronological relationships between them, but it is likely that the settlement preceded the homestead.
Information from ‘Exploring Scotland’s Heritage: The Clyde Estuary and Central Region’, (1985).
