Scheduled Maintenance
Please be advised that this website will undergo scheduled maintenance on the following dates: •
Tuesday 3rd December 11:00-15:00
During these times, some services may be temporarily unavailable. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause.
Achnabeinn
Mound (Period Unassigned)
Site Name Achnabeinn
Classification Mound (Period Unassigned)
Alternative Name(s) 'Tulloch Gorm'
Canmore ID 7696
Site Number ND05NW 11
NGR ND 0430 5726
Datum OSGB36 - NGR
Permalink http://canmore.org.uk/site/7696
- Council Highland
- Parish Reay
- Former Region Highland
- Former District Caithness
- Former County Caithness
ND05NW 11 0430 5726.
(ND 0430 5726) Mound (NR)
OS 6" map, Caithness, 2nd ed., (1907)
The remains of a large, oval, many-chambered construction. Overall it measures 88ft E-W by 56ft transversely. Numerous large pointed stones protrude irregularly through the turf. At the E side the outline of an oblong compart- ment some 23ft in length by 10ft in breadth is apparent, the wall of which at one end, built of very large stones, still stands to a height of about 3ft. The outlines of foundations visible on the turf seem to indicate a number of small oblong compartments with probably a circular one in the centre. (N.B. This is erroneously described as 'Tulloch Gorm': ND05NW 12.)
RCAHMS 1911.
This is a large, grass-over, oval stony mound, about 31m E-W by 17m transversely and 1.3m high. It is much mutilated but several upright stone slabs on the site suggest that the mound may have been a chambered cairn.
Visited by OS (E G C) 10 April 1961.
This is a turf-covered mound, generally as described by the RCAHMS, situated on gently sloping moorland above the Forse Water. The summit has been disturbed, and a number of upright stones and wall footings have been exposed which appear to form a series of compartments, but there are insufficient remains to indicate their size or purpose. They do not resemble a chambered cairn, but the mode of construction of what little remains does seem to indicate considerable antiquity. It may be a nucleated homestead, possibly multi-phased, but the quality of the remains does not allow positive classification. There is no evidence of land-use in the vicinity.
Visited by OS (J B) 7 September 1981.