Accessibility

Font Size

100% 150% 200%

Background Colour

Default Contrast
Close Reset

Pricing Change

New pricing for orders of material from this site will come into place shortly. Charges for supply of digital images, digitisation on demand, prints and licensing will be altered. 

 

Upcoming Maintenance

Please be advised that this website will undergo scheduled maintenance on the following dates:

Thursday, 9 January: 11:00 AM - 3:00 PM

Thursday, 23 January: 11:00 AM - 3:00 PM

Thursday, 30 January: 11:00 AM - 3:00 PM

During these times, some functionality such as image purchasing may be temporarily unavailable. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause.

 

White Meldon

Fort (Prehistoric), Ring Groove House(S) (Prehistoric)

Site Name White Meldon

Classification Fort (Prehistoric), Ring Groove House(S) (Prehistoric)

Alternative Name(s) Cairn And Hill Fort, White Meldon

Canmore ID 51528

Site Number NT24SW 12

NGR NT 21930 42830

Datum OSGB36 - NGR

Permalink http://canmore.org.uk/site/51528

Ordnance Survey licence number AC0000807262. All rights reserved.
Canmore Disclaimer. © Bluesky International Limited 2025. Public Sector Viewing Terms

Toggle Aerial | View on large map

Digital Images

Administrative Areas

  • Council Scottish Borders, The
  • Parish Peebles
  • Former Region Borders
  • Former District Tweeddale
  • Former County Peebles-shire

Archaeology Notes

NT24SW 12 21930 42830.

(NT 2193 4283) Hill Fort (NR)

OS 6" map (1965)

The largest native fort in the county is situated on White Meldon, a bulky hill that commands the narrow, winding valley of the Meldon Burn. Four lines of defence can be seen. The innermost (A), originally a stone wall, is now traceable only for a distance of some 60 yards on the S side of the summit. The size of the enclosure bounded by this defence is uncertain, but its E side is presumably represented by the natural scarp that extends northwards from the N end of the wall debris.

A second line of defence (B), also originally a wall, is visible on the E flank of the hill, appearing partly in the form of a low bank and partly as a mere scarp. The same wall may also be represented by a stony bank which crosses the S end of the hill-side at a distance of 120ft from A, and it may also have continued round the W side of the hill, and across the N flank, of the course later adopted by wall C.

The third line of defence (C), a wall about 12ft thick and of stone construction throughout, was faced on either side with boulders of which only a very few are visible. This is the only line of defence which is now continuously traceable. On the E it lies some 40ft outside wall B, and on the S it makes a salient to take in a small tract of ground not previously defended. The area enclosed by wall C, which measures 8 acres in extent, contains surface traces of 28 ring-groove houses.

The outermost line of defence is a fragmentary rampart (D) which appears to be unfinished. One stretch, accompanied by an external quarry-ditch, lies close to the southernmost sector of C. Another, which crosses the N flank of the hill at a maximum distance of 60ft outside C, is accompanied for part of the way by an outer rampart and ditch. The longest stretch of D lies on a natural crest-line on the E flank of the hill at a maximum distance of 80ft outside C.

Owing to the fragmentary condition of the remains, the relationship of the various elements to one another can only be determined by excavation, but it seems possible that three principal constructional phases are represented. Thus, a primary fort, defended by wall A may have been superseded by a larger one formed by B; and this in its turn may have given place to a final work, bounded by wall C. The fragmentary line D may represent an unfinished reinforcement of wall C.

(Information from R W Feachem 1961-2, 61)

RCAHMS 1967, visited 1962

As described.

Revised at 1/2500.

Visited by OS (JLD) 8 May 1962 and (BS) 2 October 1974

Photographed by the RCAHMS in 1980.

(Undated) information in NMRS.

Activities

Note (21 October 2015 - 18 October 2016)

The fort crowning the summit of the White Meldon is the largest in the upper reaches of the Tweed valley, displaying up to four lines of enclosure, the inner two of which are incomplete circuits that hint at a complex sequence in which the fort has expanded in a series of stages, though the precise sequence is unknown. The third rampart, a tumbled wall about 3.5m in thickness, is the only continuous line of defence visible today, enclosing an area measuring 260m from N to S by 167m transversely (2.9ha), within which there are traces of the stances of at least twenty-nine timber round-houses, mainly represented by shallow ring-grooves and in a few cases enclosing well-defined platforms; aerial photography and fieldwork under a range of conditions suggests there are many more round-houses hidden in the tussocky clumps of grass that clothe large areas of the interior. There are several gaps in the line of this wall, but only those on the NNE and SSW are certainly entrances; at the former the terminals of the inner rampart are staggered to expose the visitor's right side, while the latter is set in the W re-entrant formed where the S end of the fort loops out round the S spur, again exposing the visitor's right side. The second rampart, not much more than a stony scarp lying immediately up slope from the third along the E flank, probably pursued much the same course elsewhere, but the projected course of the innermost, which is no more than a band of grass-grown rubble visible on the SSE, would have formed a considerably smaller enclosure. The only place where there is any clear stratigraphy in the defences, is on the S, where a short isolated length of rampart cuts across the salient in the line of the third rampart on the S spur. This is clearly part of an earlier circuit, but whether it belongs to the second rampart, as proposed by the RCAHMS investigators in 1962, or the outermost fourth circuit visible on the E side of the fort is unknown. And while the RCAHMS investigators opted for a simple expanding sequence as the most likely explanation, in which this outermost rampart represented the fort at its maximum extent (3.6ha), with its defences enhanced by a ditch at the S extremity and an outer rampart and ditch at the N extremity, it is equally possible it formed an earlier enclosure (3.4ha) eccentrically underlying the third circuit. This outermost rampart, which the investigators also considered possibly unfinished, has several gaps along its line, but only that on the NNE is certainly an entrance, and is approached externally by a shallow worn hollow. The summit of the hill is surmounted by an OS triangulation station, but the subsidiary summit to its W has provided the site for a large round cairn, while the gully between them has been tailored in the post-medieval period to create a sheepfold.

Information from An Atlas of Hillforts of Great Britain and Ireland – 18 October 2016. Atlas of Hillforts SC3674

Sbc Note

Visibility: This is an upstanding earthwork or monument.

Information from Scottish Borders Council

References

MyCanmore Image Contributions


Contribute an Image

MyCanmore Text Contributions