Following the launch of trove.scot in February 2025 we are now planning the retiral of some of our webservices. Canmore will be switched off on 24th June 2025. Information about the closure can be found on the HES website: Retiral of HES web services | Historic Environment Scotland
Field Visit
Date July 1979
Event ID 617088
Category Recording
Type Field Visit
Permalink http://canmore.org.uk/event/617088
Mound 8ft high, 65ft diameter. Some years earlier a passage
opened up, width 3-4ft, height seldom more than 2ft, examined for
a distance of 31ft. It runs NW for 21ft then turns W. Here it
branches at right angles on either side, probably an indication
of the proximity of the chamber or chambers proper. [R1]
Listed as uncertain. [R2]
Passage now blocked, no trace of it. On SE is a section of
drystone wall revetment forming an irregular curve for about 7m.
A single earthfast stone on NW, if this is a facing stone would
indicate a diameter of 18.5m. Cairn appears to stand on a
platform similar to Quoyness, Sanday, but this is very amorphous.
Name still current. OS visit Jul 70
The section of drystone retaining wall noted by OS can be
traced for 5.5m. There are a great many erect earthfast slabs
set about the mound, on its summit and sides and about its base,
apparently belonging to slab-structures which must be assumed to
post-date the mound. The possible Quoyness-style platform is
unclear. The passage used to open to the SE where the wall is
best preserved; it was blocked up to keep rabbits out. This was
in the years just before myxamytosis ie presumably the early
1950s.
At the head of a small narrow geo on the S side is the
erosion exposure of the section (as sketched on SMR card). At
1.3m below surface is the shale bedrock on which is developed a
black loam soil now buried beneath a midden of limpet shells,
animal bones and teeth, burnt stones and sticky black earth. A
small body sherd of coarse pot was taken from here. Above are
five courses of drystone wall beneath the modern soil.
This wall appears not to be a continuation of the retaining
wall of the mound, the slope of which begins immediately above
the exposure. It seems much more likely that the wall in the
section belongs to the same context as the slab-structures on and
around the mound and that slab-structures, wall and midden
represent phases of a settlement which is later than the burial
mound. (However, it cannot be ascertained definitely that the
midden is not stratigraphically lower than the mound). The
buried soil may be the surface on which the mound is built, or a
soil developed on the slopes of the mound between the abandonment
of the mound and the establishment of the settlement.
All-in-all, the relationship between chambered tomb and
settlement presents a most interesting problem.
On the E fringe of the mound a smaller erosion exposure
above the shore shows only broken shale fragments just below the
surface. A small base sherd of pottery similar to that from the
midden, was taken from this deposit at 150mm below surface.
Information from Orkney SMR (RGL) Jul 79, inf. A Harcus, Houseby.