Following the launch of trove.scot in February 2025 we are now planning the retiral of some of our webservices. Canmore will be switched off on 24th June 2025. Information about the closure can be found on the HES website: Retiral of HES web services | Historic Environment Scotland
Field Visit
Date April 1979
Event ID 1166248
Category Recording
Type Field Visit
Permalink http://canmore.org.uk/event/1166248
NR 364 447. Situated on the irregularly shaped summit of an elongated rocky ridge on the S shore of The Ard, immediately S of Port Ellen and about 150m E of Rubha a' Chuinnlein, there is a small fort. The S side of the ridge falls at first steeply and then precipitously to the shore 9m below, and on the N heavily indented margin of the summit stands some 6m above the level of adjacent, ill-drained ground.
Measuring about 36m by 12m internally, the fort was defended by a single drystone wall and outworks. The main wall, whose inner and outer faces appear to have incorporated blocks of considerable size, is in severely wasted condition for the most part; a mass of tumbled debris covers the flanks of the ridge, particularly at the E end of the N side, where the presence of 'jumper-holes' in some of the boulders suggests that much destruction may have been caused by blasting in recent times. On the SW, however, the absence of any traces may be the result of the bodily collapse of the wall down the steeply inclined rock slope. For most of its surviving course the wall appears to have varied between 2.5m and 3m in thickness, but immediately to the W of the entrance, which is situated near the middle of the N side, it is no more than 1.3m thick. It is a curious feature of the denudation of the remains in this sector that stone-robbers appear to have selected the core material in preference to the massive facing-stones, the reverse of normal procedure.
The entrance itself is approached by way of a broad natural ramp, at the head of which the wall describes a right angle to allow direct passage through the defences; a section of the SE side-wall of the passage survives to a height of 0.55m in five courses. At the E end of the fort the main wall is set back at least 3m from the edge of a low cliff, the face of which may have been partly shaped by quarrying to provide material for the defences. Additional protection was therefore provided at this point by an outer wall, now reduced to a thin scatter of core material in which a single outer facing-stone can be seen on the edge of the cliff. Another isolated length of walling, represented by a single stretch of outer facing-stones, sprang from the main fort wall some way to the E of the entrance. It is possible that the earthfast stone situated just outside the outer face of the main fort wall on the NE may belong to the springing of such an outwork, but it is more likely to form part of a stabilising revetment for the main wall.
The interior of the fort, which is for the most part level and grass-covered, contains a number of relatively shallow depressions; the round or irregular oval examples of no great size probably indicate the activity of stone-robbers, but those of subrectangular plan, partly lined with upright slabs (a and b on RCAHMS 1984 plan) may be the remains of secondary dwellings built in the body of the tumbled wall-debris. Similar structures have been observed on fortified sites on Tiree (RCAHMS 1980).
RCAHMS 1984, visited April 1979.
