Font Size

100% 150% 200%

Background Colour

Default Contrast
Close Reset

Loch Ruthven

Crannog (Period Unassigned)(Possible)

Site Name Loch Ruthven

Classification Crannog (Period Unassigned)(Possible)

Alternative Name(s) Tom Buidhe

Canmore ID 13100

Site Number NH62NW 4

NGR NH 6036 2758

Datum OSGB36 - NGR


Ordnance Survey licence number AC0000807262. All rights reserved.
Canmore Disclaimer. © Copyright and database right 2024.

Toggle Aerial | View on large map

Digital Images

Administrative Areas

  • Council Highland
  • Parish Dores
  • Former Region Highland
  • Former District Inverness
  • Former County Inverness-shire

Archaeology Notes

NH62NW 4 6036 2758 and 6340 2810

An island in Loch Ruthven thought to be artificial was surveyed and photographed by R M'Lean and found to be circular, 57' in diameter, standing about 4' above the average level of the loch. It was said locally that a causeway could be seen on a clear day leading to a peculiar hill or mound on the shore S of the island.

F O Blundell 1913.

The OS 6" 1903 does not show an island in Loch Ruthven, but the 1875 edition shows one at NH 6038 2758. Rivet, however, refers to a crannog in the area NH 633 281 (NH62NW 68), at the other end of the loch. (Information from Mr E Meldrum, Inverness to OS)

OS 6"map annotated by A L F Rivet, May 1963.

Local enquiries revealed that there is a small island in Loch Ruthven within an area centred NH 634 281 (NH62NW 68). The loch is at present at flood level, the island apparently lying under 2' of water and not visible from the shore. No further information received from Mr Meldrum

Visited by OS (E G C) 9 September 1963.

The island described and illustrated by Blundell is at NH 6038 2757. It was inaccessible at the time of investigation, but, as seen from the shore, is undoubtedly artificial. There is no trace on the ground or on APs of a causeway to the shore. The "peculiar hill or mound" described by Blundell is a natural knoll named Tom Buidhe, at NH 6043 2740.

The island centred at NH 634 281 mentioned by OS field surveyor (E G C) was flooded at the time of visit, but from the AP it appears too small to be a crannog.

(Visible on OS air photograph OS.67.198.011)

Visited by OS (N K B) 20 March 1970.


MyCanmore Image Contributions

Contribute an Image

MyCanmore Text Contributions